(I generally donât feel that happy with my proposed definitions and the categorization in the table, and I hope other people could make better distinctions and framing for thinking about EA community strategy. )
I donât quite share your intuition on the couple of examples you suggest, and I wonder whether thatâs because our definitions differ or because the categorization really is off/âmisleading/âinaccurate.
For me, your first example shows that the relation to deference doesnât necessarily result from a choice of the overall strategy, but I still expect it to usually be correlated (unless strong and direct effort is taken to change focus on deference).
And for the second example, I think I view a kind of âmember firstâ strategy as (gradually) pushing for more cause-neutrality, whereas the cause-first is okay with stopping once a person is focused on a high-impact cause.
(I generally donât feel that happy with my proposed definitions and the categorization in the table, and I hope other people could make better distinctions and framing for thinking about EA community strategy. )
I donât quite share your intuition on the couple of examples you suggest, and I wonder whether thatâs because our definitions differ or because the categorization really is off/âmisleading/âinaccurate.
For me, your first example shows that the relation to deference doesnât necessarily result from a choice of the overall strategy, but I still expect it to usually be correlated (unless strong and direct effort is taken to change focus on deference).
And for the second example, I think I view a kind of âmember firstâ strategy as (gradually) pushing for more cause-neutrality, whereas the cause-first is okay with stopping once a person is focused on a high-impact cause.