ACE/Sinergia only used 1 row for each company, regardless of how many commitments they made.
This resulted in the wrong deadlines being used for numerous commitments. For example, for Alibem in row 4, 2031 is used as the transition deadline and 2045 as the legal deadline for all of the commitments, even though the commitments have different transition & legal deadlines.
Overall, this results in Sinergia being credited for helping millions of additional pigs who were not helped.
Agreed. Rows 3 (Alegra), 4 (Alibem), 10 (JBS), and 11 (Master Agroindustrial) each refer to welfare reforms with different legal deadlines (outlined in p. 9 here), but ACE considered a single legal deadline for each of those rows. @Vince Mak 🔸 and @Zuzana Sperlova🔸, have you considered fixing this? I feel like it is a major oversight.
ACE/Sinergia only used 1 row for each company, regardless of how many commitments they made.
This resulted in the wrong deadlines being used for numerous commitments. For example, for Alibem in row 4, 2031 is used as the transition deadline and 2045 as the legal deadline for all of the commitments, even though the commitments have different transition & legal deadlines.
Overall, this results in Sinergia being credited for helping millions of additional pigs who were not helped.
Agreed. Rows 3 (Alegra), 4 (Alibem), 10 (JBS), and 11 (Master Agroindustrial) each refer to welfare reforms with different legal deadlines (outlined in p. 9 here), but ACE considered a single legal deadline for each of those rows. @Vince Mak 🔸 and @Zuzana Sperlova🔸, have you considered fixing this? I feel like it is a major oversight.