Initially, when we didnāt see this information, we believed the most plausible explanation was that this was a translation error. However, upon reviewing the context, the most plausible explanation is that Sinergia unintentionally typed the wrong deadlineā2023 instead of 2027ā and continued to fill out other parts of the spreadsheet with the mistaken deadline. Given that this spreadsheet was prepared several months ago, we were unable to recall every detail of its compilation, but we take responsibility for the oversight.
2023 is the deadline of the other commitment from JBS regarding ācobre e soltaā. I suppose you forgot to add a new row in the sheet for the commitment with a deadline of 2027.
ACE/āSinergia only used 1 row for each company, regardless of how many commitments they made.
This resulted in the wrong deadlines being used for numerous commitments. For example, for Alibem in row 4, 2031 is used as the transition deadline and 2045 as the legal deadline for all of the commitments, even though the commitments have different transition & legal deadlines.
Overall, this results in Sinergia being credited for helping millions of additional pigs who were not helped.
Agreed. Rows 3 (Alegra), 4 (Alibem), 10 (JBS), and 11 (Master Agroindustrial) each refer to welfare reforms with different legal deadlines (outlined in p. 9 here), but ACE considered a single legal deadline for each of those rows. @Vince Mak šø and @Zuzana Sperlovašø, have you considered fixing this? I feel like it is a major oversight.
Hello Carolina.
2023 is the deadline of the other commitment from JBS regarding ācobre e soltaā. I suppose you forgot to add a new row in the sheet for the commitment with a deadline of 2027.
ACE/āSinergia only used 1 row for each company, regardless of how many commitments they made.
This resulted in the wrong deadlines being used for numerous commitments. For example, for Alibem in row 4, 2031 is used as the transition deadline and 2045 as the legal deadline for all of the commitments, even though the commitments have different transition & legal deadlines.
Overall, this results in Sinergia being credited for helping millions of additional pigs who were not helped.
Agreed. Rows 3 (Alegra), 4 (Alibem), 10 (JBS), and 11 (Master Agroindustrial) each refer to welfare reforms with different legal deadlines (outlined in p. 9 here), but ACE considered a single legal deadline for each of those rows. @Vince Mak šø and @Zuzana Sperlovašø, have you considered fixing this? I feel like it is a major oversight.