To check, I am reading you as saying that you used Google’s AI to generate that description of Nonlinear, and then you wrote down what you expected, assuming that it had 25 employees and was active for 5 years.
It does seem that the org is much smaller than you expected. Nonetheless I’d be interested to read about how surprised you are by the content of the post after stating your anticipations.
Correct: I’m vaguely aware of Kat Woods posting on FB, but haven’t investigated Nonlinear in any depth before: having an explicit definition of “what information I’m working with” seemed useful.
Yes, Nonlinear is smaller than expected.
I outlined a bad org with problems, even after adjusting for a hostile reporter and a vengeful ex-employee. I think that the evidence is somewhat weaker than what I expect, not counting that I trust you personally, and the allegations are stronger/worse. Overall, it was a negative update about Nonlinear.
To check, I am reading you as saying that you used Google’s AI to generate that description of Nonlinear, and then you wrote down what you expected, assuming that it had 25 employees and was active for 5 years.
It does seem that the org is much smaller than you expected. Nonetheless I’d be interested to read about how surprised you are by the content of the post after stating your anticipations.
Correct: I’m vaguely aware of Kat Woods posting on FB, but haven’t investigated Nonlinear in any depth before: having an explicit definition of “what information I’m working with” seemed useful.
Yes, Nonlinear is smaller than expected.
I outlined a bad org with problems, even after adjusting for a hostile reporter and a vengeful ex-employee. I think that the evidence is somewhat weaker than what I expect, not counting that I trust you personally, and the allegations are stronger/worse. Overall, it was a negative update about Nonlinear.