Thanks for the reply! I guess I thought that since the CEA already does vet people before they can attend EAG, that maybe this wouldn’t be that hard to do in practise. But I see that most people disagree with me and I appreciate your reply!
Yea. I think CEA does much less vetting than something like this would require. Ben put in hundreds of hours in this case. Maybe CEA has 10-60 minutes to decide on each organization that joins? Most of the time simple questions like, “were they funded by ea donors, and can a few EAs vouch for them” satisfy.
I think Nonlinear would seem pretty competitive with a quick review (you notice they were funded by EAs, the team is EA centric, they do projects that are used by EAs)
Thanks for the reply! I guess I thought that since the CEA already does vet people before they can attend EAG, that maybe this wouldn’t be that hard to do in practise. But I see that most people disagree with me and I appreciate your reply!
Yea. I think CEA does much less vetting than something like this would require. Ben put in hundreds of hours in this case. Maybe CEA has 10-60 minutes to decide on each organization that joins? Most of the time simple questions like, “were they funded by ea donors, and can a few EAs vouch for them” satisfy.
I think Nonlinear would seem pretty competitive with a quick review (you notice they were funded by EAs, the team is EA centric, they do projects that are used by EAs)
Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.