More minor suggestions:
OpenAI non-technical: there are more than 5.
AI Impacts non-technical: there are exactly 5.
I would have said Epoch is at least 5 FTEs (disagreeing with Mauricio).
Better estimating the number of independent technical researchers seems pretty important and tractable.
(Edit: also many people on the CHAI website don’t actually do AI safety research, but definitely more than 5 do.)
Edit: updated OpenAI from 5 to 10.
From their website, AI Impacts currently has 2 researchers and 2 support staff (the current total estimate is 3).
The current estimate for Epoch is 4 which is similar to most estimates here.
I’m trying to come up with a more accurate estimate for independent researchers and ‘Other’ researchers.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
More minor suggestions:
OpenAI non-technical: there are more than 5.
AI Impacts non-technical: there are exactly 5.
I would have said Epoch is at least 5 FTEs (disagreeing with Mauricio).
Better estimating the number of independent technical researchers seems pretty important and tractable.
(Edit: also many people on the CHAI website don’t actually do AI safety research, but definitely more than 5 do.)
Edit: updated OpenAI from 5 to 10.
From their website, AI Impacts currently has 2 researchers and 2 support staff (the current total estimate is 3).
The current estimate for Epoch is 4 which is similar to most estimates here.
I’m trying to come up with a more accurate estimate for independent researchers and ‘Other’ researchers.