- Uncertainty for people under 5 is shockingly wide - My uncertainty about the lack of counterfactualness adjustment would be wider and my estimate lower (i.e., less impact). If AMF didn’t exist, some other org might step in (but then that org would not have capacity for their marginal project? unclear).
More notes:
adjustment_for_net_coverage_years_lost_due_to_residual_nets_from_previous_distributions could be a distribution
Means of cost-effectiveness can be misleading, see here. I would instead calculate the expected number of deaths averted, and divide it by the funds.
So instead of mean(cost_per_life_saved),
More notes:
- Uncertainty for people under 5 is shockingly wide
- My uncertainty about the lack of counterfactualness adjustment would be wider and my estimate lower (i.e., less impact). If AMF didn’t exist, some other org might step in (but then that org would not have capacity for their marginal project? unclear).