eg in the UK there is often discussion of if LGBT lifestyles should be taught in school and at what age. This makes them seem weird and makes it seem risky. But this is the wrong frame—LGBT lifestyles are typical behaviour (for instance there are more LGBT people than many major world religions). Instead the question is, at what age should you discuss, say, relationships in school. There is already an answer here—I guess children learn about “mummies and daddies” almost immediately. Hence, at the same time you talk about mummies and daddies, you talk about mummies and mummies, and single dads and everything else.
By framing the question differently the answer becomes much clearer. In many cases I think the issue with bad frames (or models) is a category error.
I think I call this “the wrong frame”.
”I think you are framing that incorrectly etc”
eg in the UK there is often discussion of if LGBT lifestyles should be taught in school and at what age. This makes them seem weird and makes it seem risky. But this is the wrong frame—LGBT lifestyles are typical behaviour (for instance there are more LGBT people than many major world religions). Instead the question is, at what age should you discuss, say, relationships in school. There is already an answer here—I guess children learn about “mummies and daddies” almost immediately. Hence, at the same time you talk about mummies and daddies, you talk about mummies and mummies, and single dads and everything else.
By framing the question differently the answer becomes much clearer. In many cases I think the issue with bad frames (or models) is a category error.