We’re issuing @NobodyInteresting a warning for the above comment. The comment does not meet the expectations for civility and engaging in good faith. I would not recommend a public warning for this comment on it’s own (though I would downvote it for the above reasons, and recommend a discrete DM), but we have less tolerance for users who have not yet shown that they can engage productively.
Mr.Addison, critiquing an organization for being too western and western-focused is completely credible when that organization employs people only in the developed world with people and resumes that imply high privilege in the western society too.
This is not a critique on the people working these jobs, but on the organizational policy as a whole.
My opinion that 80.000 hours is turning into an echo-chamber is completely valid, because it would take 5 minutes to browse the employees and their backgrounds.
To wrap it up, I can be productive in engaging, literally look down and see my response to Michael, the fact that some people disliked my OPINION, is not good enough for me to decide that I am simply here for anger-farming.
We’re issuing @NobodyInteresting a warning for the above comment. The comment does not meet the expectations for civility and engaging in good faith. I would not recommend a public warning for this comment on it’s own (though I would downvote it for the above reasons, and recommend a discrete DM), but we have less tolerance for users who have not yet shown that they can engage productively.
Mr.Addison, critiquing an organization for being too western and western-focused is completely credible when that organization employs people only in the developed world with people and resumes that imply high privilege in the western society too.
This is not a critique on the people working these jobs, but on the organizational policy as a whole.
My opinion that 80.000 hours is turning into an echo-chamber is completely valid, because it would take 5 minutes to browse the employees and their backgrounds.
To wrap it up, I can be productive in engaging, literally look down and see my response to Michael, the fact that some people disliked my OPINION, is not good enough for me to decide that I am simply here for anger-farming.