Thanks!
OK interesting idea—to your question utilistrutil they did that by reaching out after they were rejected.
Hmm yes perhaps having a more standardised feedback process would work well, though I’m not sure how much of the value would be lost by it not being personalised (or being less personalised). Certainyl something to keep in mind for next time.
If you like, I could ask Sofia Balderson about sharing her method/model so that you could see how it works, and possibly adapt it. Let me know if you want me to put you in touch with her.
Thanks, I think hold off for now as I am not sure whether this will run next year (quite likely it will) and who will be running it, how it will be structured etc.
Thanks! OK interesting idea—to your question utilistrutil they did that by reaching out after they were rejected. Hmm yes perhaps having a more standardised feedback process would work well, though I’m not sure how much of the value would be lost by it not being personalised (or being less personalised). Certainyl something to keep in mind for next time.
If you like, I could ask Sofia Balderson about sharing her method/model so that you could see how it works, and possibly adapt it. Let me know if you want me to put you in touch with her.
Thanks, I think hold off for now as I am not sure whether this will run next year (quite likely it will) and who will be running it, how it will be structured etc.