Anonymous submission: I have pretty strong epistemics against the current approach of āweāve tried nothing and weāre all out of ideasā. Itās totally tedious seeing reasonably ideas get put forward, some contrarian position gets presented, and the community reverts to ādo nothingā. That recent idea of a co-signed letter about slowing down research is a good example of the intellectual paralysis that annoys me. In some ways it feels built on perhaps a good analytical foundation, but a poor understanding of how humans and psychology and policy change actually work.
Anonymous submission: I have pretty strong epistemics against the current approach of āweāve tried nothing and weāre all out of ideasā. Itās totally tedious seeing reasonably ideas get put forward, some contrarian position gets presented, and the community reverts to ādo nothingā. That recent idea of a co-signed letter about slowing down research is a good example of the intellectual paralysis that annoys me. In some ways it feels built on perhaps a good analytical foundation, but a poor understanding of how humans and psychology and policy change actually work.