Deceptive AIs will be able to hide unwanted behaviours from mechanistic interpretability tools (e.g. by encoding them redundantly across pathways, or shifting them into representations the tools do not capture)
you don’t even say “most of the time” or “effectively” or anything—just ask whether it is possible. I think the probability that this occurs at least once is overwhelmingly likely.
The intent was that a 100% disagreement signals confidence in mechinterp to basically completely solve detecting deception. That said, there are already some cases of deception, so the question is implicitly focusing on the balance in strategically vital situations and the final equilibrium.
you don’t even say “most of the time” or “effectively” or anything—just ask whether it is possible. I think the probability that this occurs at least once is overwhelmingly likely.
The intent was that a 100% disagreement signals confidence in mechinterp to basically completely solve detecting deception. That said, there are already some cases of deception, so the question is implicitly focusing on the balance in strategically vital situations and the final equilibrium.
yes, I quickly realized that you were supposed to confabulate your own question to answer. unusual subcultural practice for alleged poll questions.