The intent was that a 100% disagreement signals confidence in mechinterp to basically completely solve detecting deception. That said, there are already some cases of deception, so the question is implicitly focusing on the balance in strategically vital situations and the final equilibrium.
The intent was that a 100% disagreement signals confidence in mechinterp to basically completely solve detecting deception. That said, there are already some cases of deception, so the question is implicitly focusing on the balance in strategically vital situations and the final equilibrium.
yes, I quickly realized that you were supposed to confabulate your own question to answer. unusual subcultural practice for alleged poll questions.