Thank you for your initial answer and response jtm, Iāve found both very valuable to read. As always, itād be really interesting to know more but Iāll leave my questions here and not pry further. Thanks for sharing your insight, and I hope youāre enjoying your new role and doing good work there :)
Hi, thanks for your response and for the context about general university-related processes.
Iām pretty confident that if you ask almost anyone who has worked for FHI within the past two years, their overall account will match mine, even if they would frame some details differently. In my time there, I did not hear anyone present a significantly different version of events. (I donāt just mean this rhetorically ā itād be great to hear from anyone else at FHI here!)
Iāll just respond with some context to specific parts:
First, the entire Oxford University had a hiring freezeānot just the Philosophy Dept., not just FHIāthe whole school paused hiring when Covid hit. The university I worked for did the same thing just 4 years prior when itās endowment took a massive hitāhiring freezes are normal.
No, I was referring to a hiring freeze affecting FHI, specifically. As mentioned, the Global Priorities Institute ā based in the same philosophy department, at the same university, and using the same offices ā has been able to recruit new hires long after FHI stopped being able to do so in early 2021. (I think I received my job offer in late 2020; I know that RSP was unable to recruit for a new cohort when they tried to do so in January 2021).
For those running to point out GPI is hiringāthatās because the Forethought Foundation helps them circumvent the dept (which is what FHI was trying to do too).
As far as I am aware, most/āall GPI staff are members of the University staff, i.e. hired by GPI rather than Forethought.
Second, the first thing one does when money is tight is prioritizeāand unfortunately that brings up an uncomfortable conversation about which departments are essential/āpriority to sustain. [...] Unfortunately, Oxford might be reevaluating FHI in light of its new institute
I donāt know FHIās exact financial situation, but I know that the institute relied to a significant degree on philanthropic funding (e.g. 1, 2, 3), as opposed to funding from the university. I think it is very unlikely that FHIās inability to hire owes to not receiving funds from the University. For example, Open Philanthropy recommended a large grant for the Research Scholars Program in April 2021, but the program has still not been able to bring on new scholars since then.
Third, the āformal reviewā that JTM mentioned was probably a review being done on all depts
No, I am quite confident that this was specifically a review of FHI. This impression is based on conversations among staff. Looking just now, I also have an email that was sent to FHI staff from the Faculty of Philosophy that gives me the same impression.
Finally, JTM also mentioned that GPI hasnāt been struggling as much as FHI and suggest itās because of senior leadershipās relationship with the University.
Maybe you would also call this hearsay, but in their resignation letter that was circulated among staff in August 2021 (shared by the resignee themself), one senior member of FHIās staff referred specifically to the āunreasonably bad relationship with the facultyā as the cause of FHIās inability to hire or fundraise.
Thank you for your initial answer and response jtm, Iāve found both very valuable to read. As always, itād be really interesting to know more but Iāll leave my questions here and not pry further. Thanks for sharing your insight, and I hope youāre enjoying your new role and doing good work there :)
[edit deleted]
Hi, thanks for your response and for the context about general university-related processes.
Iām pretty confident that if you ask almost anyone who has worked for FHI within the past two years, their overall account will match mine, even if they would frame some details differently. In my time there, I did not hear anyone present a significantly different version of events. (I donāt just mean this rhetorically ā itād be great to hear from anyone else at FHI here!)
Iāll just respond with some context to specific parts:
No, I was referring to a hiring freeze affecting FHI, specifically. As mentioned, the Global Priorities Institute ā based in the same philosophy department, at the same university, and using the same offices ā has been able to recruit new hires long after FHI stopped being able to do so in early 2021. (I think I received my job offer in late 2020; I know that RSP was unable to recruit for a new cohort when they tried to do so in January 2021).
As far as I am aware, most/āall GPI staff are members of the University staff, i.e. hired by GPI rather than Forethought.
I donāt know FHIās exact financial situation, but I know that the institute relied to a significant degree on philanthropic funding (e.g. 1, 2, 3), as opposed to funding from the university. I think it is very unlikely that FHIās inability to hire owes to not receiving funds from the University. For example, Open Philanthropy recommended a large grant for the Research Scholars Program in April 2021, but the program has still not been able to bring on new scholars since then.
No, I am quite confident that this was specifically a review of FHI. This impression is based on conversations among staff. Looking just now, I also have an email that was sent to FHI staff from the Faculty of Philosophy that gives me the same impression.
Maybe you would also call this hearsay, but in their resignation letter that was circulated among staff in August 2021 (shared by the resignee themself), one senior member of FHIās staff referred specifically to the āunreasonably bad relationship with the facultyā as the cause of FHIās inability to hire or fundraise.