It is obivous that Chalmers is rigth in some way as long as life is simply an state of matter, so when you understand what determines the emergence of epiphenomenal conscience, you can replicate it in other substrate. But we can only experiment with our own conscience. We attribute conscience to others only because we are conscient and the rest of humans are so similar to us that it is almost impossible there are not. So here are metaphysical difficulties in any experimental agenda when physical similarity is lost, and as long as we dont know why we are conscient, we really dont know what to replicate.
You could be rigth, but conscience is totally noumenal, so we really can not know.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/nY7oAdy5odfGqE7mQ/freedom-under-naturalistic-dualism
It is obivous that Chalmers is rigth in some way as long as life is simply an state of matter, so when you understand what determines the emergence of epiphenomenal conscience, you can replicate it in other substrate. But we can only experiment with our own conscience. We attribute conscience to others only because we are conscient and the rest of humans are so similar to us that it is almost impossible there are not. So here are metaphysical difficulties in any experimental agenda when physical similarity is lost, and as long as we dont know why we are conscient, we really dont know what to replicate.