My conclusions are different throughout the post including in the title! I’m still not sure whether space governance is more like international policy, or more like EA community building—maybe its a mix of the two, where it’s actually like international policy but we should treat it more like EA community building.
So either space governance is a “meta-cause area” or an “area of expertise”, but not a “cause area” in the sense that the term is most often used (i.e. a cause to address).
My conclusions are different throughout the post including in the title! I’m still not sure whether space governance is more like international policy, or more like EA community building—maybe its a mix of the two, where it’s actually like international policy but we should treat it more like EA community building.
So either space governance is a “meta-cause area” or an “area of expertise”, but not a “cause area” in the sense that the term is most often used (i.e. a cause to address).
Yeah, I agree that the title is part of your view, but I think your view is very poorly summarized by the title.
That’s fair