Personally, I see large differences in the expected impact of potential new hires. I’m surprised you don’t, especially at the startup stage, and am not sure what’s going on there. I would guess you should be more picky for some of the reasons listed in Rob’s post.
I also feel very constrained by management capacity etc. This drives the value of past hires up even further, which is what the survey was about (as also in Rob’s post).
I do see large differences in expected impact of potential new hires, but I see a lot of hires who would be net positive additions (even after accounting all the various obvious costs enumerated by Rob) and even had to unfortunately turn away a few people I think would have been rather enormously net positive.
We’re not constrained by management capacity but we will be soon.
Personally, I see large differences in the expected impact of potential new hires. I’m surprised you don’t, especially at the startup stage, and am not sure what’s going on there. I would guess you should be more picky for some of the reasons listed in Rob’s post.
I also feel very constrained by management capacity etc. This drives the value of past hires up even further, which is what the survey was about (as also in Rob’s post).
I do see large differences in expected impact of potential new hires, but I see a lot of hires who would be net positive additions (even after accounting all the various obvious costs enumerated by Rob) and even had to unfortunately turn away a few people I think would have been rather enormously net positive.
We’re not constrained by management capacity but we will be soon.