I was thinking it over, and I think that I was implicitly assuming that process orthogonality follows from orthogonality in some form or something like that.
The Deep Blue question still holds, I think.
The human brain should be thought of as designed by evolution. What I wrote is strictly (non-process) orthogonality. An example could be given that the cognitive breakthrough might have been enlargement of the neocortex, while civilization was responsible for the values.
I guess that the point is that there are example of non-orthogonality? (Say, the evaluation function of DeepBlue being critical for it’s success)
I was thinking it over, and I think that I was implicitly assuming that process orthogonality follows from orthogonality in some form or something like that.
The Deep Blue question still holds, I think.
The human brain should be thought of as designed by evolution. What I wrote is strictly (non-process) orthogonality. An example could be given that the cognitive breakthrough might have been enlargement of the neocortex, while civilization was responsible for the values.
I guess that the point is that there are example of non-orthogonality? (Say, the evaluation function of DeepBlue being critical for it’s success)