Didn’t vote, but I think your comment didn’t grapple with legal exposures. They are likely higher for FTXFF affiliated persons than anyone else still in EA, and the FTX estate isn’t going to shell out for legal advice and analysis so they can manage EA PR risks.
I think your adverse-inference reasoning can be valid in some cases, even those with legal implications if involving orgs.
I didn’t downvote your original comment, but I think the sample space of possible options is quite wide, and it shouldn’t be too difficult for a reasonable person to generate a subset of them.
I will try to refrain from making further meta-level observations.
Could someone say why they downvoted this comment?
Didn’t vote, but I think your comment didn’t grapple with legal exposures. They are likely higher for FTXFF affiliated persons than anyone else still in EA, and the FTX estate isn’t going to shell out for legal advice and analysis so they can manage EA PR risks.
I think your adverse-inference reasoning can be valid in some cases, even those with legal implications if involving orgs.
Two people downvoted this comment O_o
I didn’t downvote your original comment, but I think the sample space of possible options is quite wide, and it shouldn’t be too difficult for a reasonable person to generate a subset of them.
I will try to refrain from making further meta-level observations.