I generally agree with the process suggested for achieving those outcomes (AI Safety movement builders contribute to AI Safety by helping to start and scale AI Safety projects. Projects require contributions of many technical and non-technical professions and skills in full-time and fractional capacities.)
Feedback thread (agree/disagree vote)
Determining clear priorities for AI Safety Movement Building is an important bottleneck
Fractional movement building seems like something that we should do more of in AI Safety
There is too much uncertainty about what AI Safety Movement Building is, and how to do it helpfully
I think that it would be useful to regularly evaluate AI Safety Movement building progress
I generally agree with the process suggested for achieving those outcomes (AI Safety movement builders contribute to AI Safety by helping to start and scale AI Safety projects. Projects require contributions of many technical and non-technical professions and skills in full-time and fractional capacities.)
I generally agree with the suggested outcomes for AI Safety Movement Builders to focus on (contributors, contributions and coordination)
I generally agree with the claims and approach outlined in this post