(This is something we haven’t edited from LessWrong, so this is me speaking for why I agree with their call, not why I made it myself.) I’d say it’s a little of both. I’d like to allow users to change it if it’s important, but heavily discourage changes that lose continuity of user identification without much gain. If you have to talk to a human to do it, you’re only going to do that if you think it’s important. Maybe in the ideal case we’d do something like facebook, where they let you do it, but discourage you through multiple levels of “are you sure?” and “you won’t be able to change your name again for x days”. And/or we could implement moderator review. But we probably won’t prioritize building these, as it seems like a lot of UI functionality that will be very rarely exercised, which is a recipe for bugs.
I second this. Right now, we review all new users when they join the Forum, including their names. We’d also want to review all name changes if users could make them, which isn’t too different from users asking us for name changes (though infrastructure allowing that would be nice to have someday).
For anyone who wants an example of how a username change could cause a prblem: If you try to use “Will MacAskilI” (with a capital “I” instead of the second “L”) as a username, you’ll be caught before your account is approved. So we’re also wary of someone changing their name to that and then pretending to be Will for a bit.
(This is something we haven’t edited from LessWrong, so this is me speaking for why I agree with their call, not why I made it myself.) I’d say it’s a little of both. I’d like to allow users to change it if it’s important, but heavily discourage changes that lose continuity of user identification without much gain. If you have to talk to a human to do it, you’re only going to do that if you think it’s important. Maybe in the ideal case we’d do something like facebook, where they let you do it, but discourage you through multiple levels of “are you sure?” and “you won’t be able to change your name again for x days”. And/or we could implement moderator review. But we probably won’t prioritize building these, as it seems like a lot of UI functionality that will be very rarely exercised, which is a recipe for bugs.
I second this. Right now, we review all new users when they join the Forum, including their names. We’d also want to review all name changes if users could make them, which isn’t too different from users asking us for name changes (though infrastructure allowing that would be nice to have someday).
For anyone who wants an example of how a username change could cause a prblem: If you try to use “Will MacAskilI” (with a capital “I” instead of the second “L”) as a username, you’ll be caught before your account is approved. So we’re also wary of someone changing their name to that and then pretending to be Will for a bit.