This seems to be a further example of what the OP’s point that she overlooked. There are multiple principles one might use to differentiate the two views:
It is bad to abort a foetus
It is good to have children
but many of them are not available to EAs:
EAs tend not to believe in the acts-omissions distinction
EAs tend not to hold person-effecting views of ethics
EAs tend to value the welfare of those who have not even been conceived yet.
EAs are unlikely to believe that having been responsibly chaste / using contraception and thereby not becoming pregnant relieves you of any responsibility for the unborn
This seems to be a further example of what the OP’s point that she overlooked. There are multiple principles one might use to differentiate the two views:
It is bad to abort a foetus
It is good to have children
but many of them are not available to EAs:
EAs tend not to believe in the acts-omissions distinction
EAs tend not to hold person-effecting views of ethics
EAs tend to value the welfare of those who have not even been conceived yet.
EAs are unlikely to believe that having been responsibly chaste / using contraception and thereby not becoming pregnant relieves you of any responsibility for the unborn