When weighing opportunities to improve talent, capital, and insight, how (if at all) do you consider the priorities of other major funders in the space? For instance, since Open Phil “does not fund organizations focused primarily on raising money for effective charities” in its EA Focus Area but devotes significant resources to improving talent and insight, would the Fund managers consider prioritizing grants that improve capital to fill this gap?
Disclosure: I work for TLYCS, an organization that works to move money to EA charities working on global health and development.
Also: thanks so much for answering all these questions- very helpful in understanding how the fund will be managed!
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
When weighing opportunities to improve talent, capital, and insight, how (if at all) do you consider the priorities of other major funders in the space? For instance, since Open Phil “does not fund organizations focused primarily on raising money for effective charities” in its EA Focus Area but devotes significant resources to improving talent and insight, would the Fund managers consider prioritizing grants that improve capital to fill this gap?
Disclosure: I work for TLYCS, an organization that works to move money to EA charities working on global health and development.
Also: thanks so much for answering all these questions- very helpful in understanding how the fund will be managed!