You don’t, but that’s a different proposition with a different set of cruxes since it is based on ex post rather than ex ante.
I’m saying we need to specify more than, “The chance that the full stack of individual propositions evaluates as true in the relevant direction.” I’m not sure if we’re disagreeing, or … ?
You don’t, but that’s a different proposition with a different set of cruxes since it is based on ex post rather than ex ante.
I’m saying we need to specify more than, “The chance that the full stack of individual propositions evaluates as true in the relevant direction.” I’m not sure if we’re disagreeing, or … ?