Thanks! I wouldn’t take its takes too seriously, as it has limited context and seems to make a bunch of mistakes. It’s more a thing to use to help flag potential issues (at this stage), knowing there’s a false positive rate.
Thanks! I wouldn’t take its takes too seriously, as it has limited context and seems to make a bunch of mistakes. It’s more a thing to use to help flag potential issues (at this stage), knowing there’s a false positive rate.