Would he pay the mugger in a Pascal’s mugging? Generally does he think acting fanatically is an issue?
How does he think we should set a prior for the question of whether or not we are living at the most influential time? Uniform prior or otherwise?
What are his key heuristics for doing good philosophy, and how does he spot bad philosophical arguments?
Would he pay the mugger in a Pascal’s mugging? Generally does he think acting fanatically is an issue?
How does he think we should set a prior for the question of whether or not we are living at the most influential time? Uniform prior or otherwise?
What are his key heuristics for doing good philosophy, and how does he spot bad philosophical arguments?