I think the wiki entry is a pretty good place for this. Itâs âthe canonical placeâ as it were. I would think itâs important to do this rather fairly. I wouldnât want someone to edit a short CEA article with a âlist of criticismsâ, that (believe you me) could go on for days. And then maybe, just because nobody has a personal motivation to, nobody ends up doing this for Giving What We Can. Or whatever. Seems like the whole thing could quickly prove to be a mess that I would personally judge to be not worth it (unsure). Iâd rather see someone own editing a class of orgs and adding in substantial content, including a criticism section that seeks to focus on the highest impact concerns.
I think the wiki entry is a pretty good place for this. Itâs âthe canonical placeâ as it were. I would think itâs important to do this rather fairly. I wouldnât want someone to edit a short CEA article with a âlist of criticismsâ, that (believe you me) could go on for days. And then maybe, just because nobody has a personal motivation to, nobody ends up doing this for Giving What We Can. Or whatever. Seems like the whole thing could quickly prove to be a mess that I would personally judge to be not worth it (unsure). Iâd rather see someone own editing a class of orgs and adding in substantial content, including a criticism section that seeks to focus on the highest impact concerns.