(1) differences in CFF could fail to reflect differences in the subjective experience of time, and (2) differences in the subjective experience of time could fail to be reflected in differences in CFF.
This wording here is confusing to me. With C = differences in CFF, and S = differences in subjective experience of time, this is
(1) C could fail to reflect S
(2) S could fail to be reflected in C
But these mean the same thing to me. In both cases, we’re asking about differences in CFF doing the reflecting, and differences in subjective experience of time being reflected.
Did you mean that C could fail to reflect S, and S could fail to reflect C?
Also, it might be helpful for readability to separate the discussion of the two points in separate subsections.
Thanks, and apologies if the wording is unclear. To clarify, in the post I discuss both
(a) situations in which it looks like a difference in CFF is not accompanied by a difference in the subjective experience of time and (b) situations in which it looks like a difference in the subjective experience of time is not accompanied by a difference in CFF.
This wording here is confusing to me. With C = differences in CFF, and S = differences in subjective experience of time, this is
(1) C could fail to reflect S
(2) S could fail to be reflected in C
But these mean the same thing to me. In both cases, we’re asking about differences in CFF doing the reflecting, and differences in subjective experience of time being reflected.
Did you mean that C could fail to reflect S, and S could fail to reflect C?
Also, it might be helpful for readability to separate the discussion of the two points in separate subsections.
Thanks, and apologies if the wording is unclear. To clarify, in the post I discuss both (a) situations in which it looks like a difference in CFF is not accompanied by a difference in the subjective experience of time and (b) situations in which it looks like a difference in the subjective experience of time is not accompanied by a difference in CFF.