This is all really useful, especially the second point regarding actual vs. perceived behaviors.
I do think there are some similarities between all these points that Iād maybe categorise under āelitistā (although I donāt want to because I think that term has different connotations for people). But perhaps something like āEAs are perceived as being better than non-EAsā an this is expressed as the items I mentioned.
But perhaps it wouldnāt be possible to draw these inferences without the comments themselves, where Iād imagine people discussed these overlapping topics.
Iāve updated the category name for now based on the above + split the lack of interest from what you mentioned in point 3.
I do think there are some similarities between all these points that Iād maybe categorise under āelitistā (although I donāt want to because I think that term has different connotations for people). But perhaps something like āEAs are perceived as being better than non-EAsā an this is expressed as the items I mentioned.
I think thereās something of a family resemblance, but that it still wouldnāt be possible to categorise them all as one thing. For example, I donāt think disliking āhigh standardsā, necessarily entails disliking a āperceived attitude towards othersā, or necessarily even thinking that anyone has any particular attitude towards others. I would think itās difficult/āimpossible to reliable tease these apart without access to the specific responses (which is unfortunately impossible, since we donāt have permission to share any of peopleās qualitative responses).
If there was sufficient interest we could analyse this with more of a qualitative network approach, which can identify these clusters, but as you can imagine itās relatively time-intensive to do.
To get another reference point I coded the āHigh Standardsā comments and found that 75% did not seem to be about āperceived attitudes towards others.ā Many comments explicitly disavowed the idea that that they think EAs look down on others, for example, but still reported that they feel bad because of demandingness considerations or because āeveryone in the community is so talentedā etc.
This is all really useful, especially the second point regarding actual vs. perceived behaviors.
I do think there are some similarities between all these points that Iād maybe categorise under āelitistā (although I donāt want to because I think that term has different connotations for people). But perhaps something like āEAs are perceived as being better than non-EAsā an this is expressed as the items I mentioned.
But perhaps it wouldnāt be possible to draw these inferences without the comments themselves, where Iād imagine people discussed these overlapping topics.
Iāve updated the category name for now based on the above + split the lack of interest from what you mentioned in point 3.
I think thereās something of a family resemblance, but that it still wouldnāt be possible to categorise them all as one thing. For example, I donāt think disliking āhigh standardsā, necessarily entails disliking a āperceived attitude towards othersā, or necessarily even thinking that anyone has any particular attitude towards others. I would think itās difficult/āimpossible to reliable tease these apart without access to the specific responses (which is unfortunately impossible, since we donāt have permission to share any of peopleās qualitative responses).
If there was sufficient interest we could analyse this with more of a qualitative network approach, which can identify these clusters, but as you can imagine itās relatively time-intensive to do.
To get another reference point I coded the āHigh Standardsā comments and found that 75% did not seem to be about āperceived attitudes towards others.ā Many comments explicitly disavowed the idea that that they think EAs look down on others, for example, but still reported that they feel bad because of demandingness considerations or because āeveryone in the community is so talentedā etc.