I came across this spreadsheet buried in a comment thread. I donât know who made it (maybe @MarcusAbramovitch knows) but, itâs great. It shows a breakdown of all OP grants by cause area and organisation, updated automatically every day:
This is great. Do we know if all grants are assigned to only one area? In other words, if I want to know the total amount spent on farmed animal welfare more broadly, is it appropriate to add up the sums for âFarmed Animal Welfareâ + âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ + âCage-Free Reformsâ + . . . .
You can see the raw data in the final tab, everything is only given one âFocus Areaâ, and there are some obviously less-than-ideal codings (e.g. âF.R.E.E. â Broiler and Cage-Free Reforms in Romaniaâ is âFarm Animal Welfareâ but not âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ)
Edit: sorry I didnât read your question properly, I think the answer to whether itâs appropriate to add up âFarmed Animal Welfareâ + âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ + âCage-Free Reformsâ etc is yes
Thanks! In your example, one could argue for placing F.R.E.E. in âCage-Free Reformsâ as well. That might explain the use of âFarmed Animal Welfareâ for that grant, since there may have been a decent argument for multiple more specific categories.
Thanks for re-sharing! Unfortunately, these make it quite unclear how much theyâve given to EA. (I assume itâs a large chunk of âGCR Capacity Buildingâ
Breakdown of Open Philanthropy grants to date
I came across this spreadsheet buried in a comment thread. I donât know who made it (maybe @MarcusAbramovitch knows) but, itâs great. It shows a breakdown of all OP grants by cause area and organisation, updated automatically every day:
This is the post introducing the spreadsheet: EffectiveAltruismData.com is now a spreadsheet from @Hamish McDoodles
oh hey
cool to see people are finding this useful
This is great. Do we know if all grants are assigned to only one area? In other words, if I want to know the total amount spent on farmed animal welfare more broadly, is it appropriate to add up the sums for âFarmed Animal Welfareâ + âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ + âCage-Free Reformsâ + . . . .
You can see the raw data in the final tab, everything is only given one âFocus Areaâ, and there are some obviously less-than-ideal codings (e.g. âF.R.E.E. â Broiler and Cage-Free Reforms in Romaniaâ is âFarm Animal Welfareâ but not âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ)
Edit: sorry I didnât read your question properly, I think the answer to whether itâs appropriate to add up âFarmed Animal Welfareâ + âBroiler Chicken Welfareâ + âCage-Free Reformsâ etc is yes
Thanks! In your example, one could argue for placing F.R.E.E. in âCage-Free Reformsâ as well. That might explain the use of âFarmed Animal Welfareâ for that grant, since there may have been a decent argument for multiple more specific categories.
Thanks for re-sharing! Unfortunately, these make it quite unclear how much theyâve given to EA. (I assume itâs a large chunk of âGCR Capacity Buildingâ