I think these are all reasonable critiques. Re: the third point, I think a possible version of Lizka’s claim is that under futarchy, reification of perceived goals in a very stark, precise and measurable way makes the values more stable and less set to change, such that movements like EA are less capable of making headway via value change, relative to in an anarchic or democratic system.
I think these are all reasonable critiques. Re: the third point, I think a possible version of Lizka’s claim is that under futarchy, reification of perceived goals in a very stark, precise and measurable way makes the values more stable and less set to change, such that movements like EA are less capable of making headway via value change, relative to in an anarchic or democratic system.