Note you have to practically disregard the models RP used to get to this range of the multiplier. “Welfare range with neuron counts” = “weight on neuron counts”*”welfare range based solely on neuron counts” + (1 - “weight on neuron counts”)*”welfare range without neuron counts (RP’s)” ⇔ “weight on neuron counts” = (1 − 1/”multiplier”)/(1 - “welfare range based solely on neuron counts”/”welfare range with neuron counts”), where “multiplier” = “welfare range without neuron counts”/”welfare range with neuron counts”. So you would need the following weights on neuron counts:
Thanks for the post, Nick.
Note you have to practically disregard the models RP used to get to this range of the multiplier. “Welfare range with neuron counts” = “weight on neuron counts”*”welfare range based solely on neuron counts” + (1 - “weight on neuron counts”)*”welfare range without neuron counts (RP’s)” ⇔ “weight on neuron counts” = (1 − 1/”multiplier”)/(1 - “welfare range based solely on neuron counts”/”welfare range with neuron counts”), where “multiplier” = “welfare range without neuron counts”/”welfare range with neuron counts”. So you would need the following weights on neuron counts:
For chickens, and a multiplier of:
5, 80.6 % (= (1 − 1⁄5)/(1 − 0.00244/0.332)).
100, 99.7 % (= (1 − 1⁄100)/(1 − 0.00244/0.332)).
For shrimp, and a multiplier of:
5, 80.0 % (= (1 − 1⁄5 − 1)/(1 − 10^-6/0.031)).
100, 99.0 % (= (1 − 1⁄100)/(1 − 10^-6/0.031)).
Thanks Vasco yeah my apologies I messed this one up, have changed it now. Where’s the “OOps” emoji.