Re: The old wiki on the EA Hub, Iâm afraid the old wiki data got corrupted, it wasnât backed up properly and it was deemed too difficult to restore at the time :(. So it looks like the information in that wiki is now lost to the winds. Iâm very sorry about that.
This may or may not fulfil your needs (and isnât _quite_ a wiki), but the EA Hub resources (resources.eahub.org), is a repository for EA links, and we hope to grow the number of resources available. We will soon have a way for people to make suggestions for changes and additions. which will be vetted before loading onto the website.
Re: The old wiki on the EA Hub, Iâm afraid the old wiki data got corrupted, it wasnât backed up properly and it was deemed too difficult to restore at the time :(. So it looks like the information in that wiki is now lost to the winds.
Hi, as the person who personally generated the wiki dump, I can assure you that the complete content of every edit revision of every article was saved, and the data is saved in an XML format that can be trivially imported into MediaWiki. Additionally, I grabbed it after site activity had already died down, but before the wiki got taken over by spambots, so the dump should be in pretty much perfect condition.
the information in that wiki is now lost to the wind
Woh, thatâs sad. Some thing for us to keep in mind for the future...
This may or may not fulfil your needs (and isnât _quite_ a wiki), but the EA Hub resources (resources.eahub.org), is a repository for EA links, and we hope to grow the number of resources available.
Indeed, suggestions would solve many problems! Still, the question is how to make it appealing for contribution. I really like button âEditâ on wikipedia, as it doesnât imply complex underlying revision processes and gives me around as much power as I want...
Can you please share your vision on the optimal knowledge management within EA? @EdoArad provided quite some ideas on how it could be organized, and among other I agree with the vision that if anywhere, the new knowledge base should be kept under EA Hub domain. So if you think it worth discussing, Iâd be happy to engage.
Re: The old wiki on the EA Hub, Iâm afraid the old wiki data got corrupted, it wasnât backed up properly and it was deemed too difficult to restore at the time :(. So it looks like the information in that wiki is now lost to the winds. Iâm very sorry about that.
This may or may not fulfil your needs (and isnât _quite_ a wiki), but the EA Hub resources (resources.eahub.org), is a repository for EA links, and we hope to grow the number of resources available. We will soon have a way for people to make suggestions for changes and additions. which will be vetted before loading onto the website.
I think a dump of the wiki is available at https://ââarchive.org/ââdetails/ââwiki-wikieahuborg_w.
Unfortunately, no. The archive there contains only the html with the main page and some logos...
Hi, as the person who personally generated the wiki dump, I can assure you that the complete content of every edit revision of every article was saved, and the data is saved in an XML format that can be trivially imported into MediaWiki. Additionally, I grabbed it after site activity had already died down, but before the wiki got taken over by spambots, so the dump should be in pretty much perfect condition.
Oh, sorry, didnât figure it out. Thanks for clarification!
Do you by chance know why the old wiki died?
wikieahuborg_w-20180412-history.xmlcontains the dump, which can be imported to a MediaWiki instance.Do you know approximately how many monthly visitors the old wiki had?
Thanks for the answer!
Woh, thatâs sad. Some thing for us to keep in mind for the future...
Indeed, suggestions would solve many problems! Still, the question is how to make it appealing for contribution. I really like button âEditâ on wikipedia, as it doesnât imply complex underlying revision processes and gives me around as much power as I want...
Can you please share your vision on the optimal knowledge management within EA? @EdoArad provided quite some ideas on how it could be organized, and among other I agree with the vision that if anywhere, the new knowledge base should be kept under EA Hub domain. So if you think it worth discussing, Iâd be happy to engage.