The EA community has collected and developed a very large set of ideas that arenāt widely known outside of EA, such that āgetting up to speedā can take a similar amount of effort to a decent fraction of a bachelorās degree
But the community is relatively small and new (compared to e.g. most academic fields), so we have relatively little in the way of textbooks, courses, summaries, etc.
This means it can take a lot of effort and time to get up to speed, lots of EAs have substantial āgapsā in their āEA knowledgeā, lots of concepts are misinterpreted or conflated or misapplied, etc.
The EA Wiki is a good step towards having good resources to help people get up to speed
A bunch of research indicates retrieval practice, especially when spaced and interleaved, can improve long-term retention and can also help with things like application of concepts (not just memory)
And Anki provides such spaced, interleaved retrieval practice
Iām being lazy in not explaining the jargon or citing my sources, but you can find some explanation and sources here: Augmenting Long-term Memory
If one person makes an Anki deck based on the EA Wiki entries, it can then be used and/āor built on by other people, can be shared with participants in EA Fellowships, etc.
Possible reasons not to do this:
āThereās a lot of stuff itād be useful for people to know that isnāt on EA Wiki entries. Why not make Anki cards on those things instead? Isnāt this a bit insular?ā
I think we can and should do both, rather than one or the other
Same goes for having Anki cards based on EA sources vs Anki cards based on non-EA sources
Personally, Iād guess ~25% of my Anki cards are based on EA sources, ~70% are based on non-EA sources but are about topics I see as important for EA reasons, and 5% are random personal life stuff
I think there are a lot of people in the EA community for whom engaging with the EA Wiki entries to the extent required to make this deck would be worthwhile just for themselves
I also think there are even more people in the EA community for whom using all or a subset of these cards will be worthwhile
(Though there are also of course people for whom these things arenāt true)
āMany of the entries probably wonāt actually be that well-suited to Anki cards, or arenāt on very important thingsā
Agreed
But many will be
The card-maker(s) can skip entries, and the card-users can delete some cards from their own copy of the deck
Why this might be worthwhile:
The EA community has collected and developed a very large set of ideas that arenāt widely known outside of EA, such that āgetting up to speedā can take a similar amount of effort to a decent fraction of a bachelorās degree
But the community is relatively small and new (compared to e.g. most academic fields), so we have relatively little in the way of textbooks, courses, summaries, etc.
This means it can take a lot of effort and time to get up to speed, lots of EAs have substantial āgapsā in their āEA knowledgeā, lots of concepts are misinterpreted or conflated or misapplied, etc.
The EA Wiki is a good step towards having good resources to help people get up to speed
A bunch of research indicates retrieval practice, especially when spaced and interleaved, can improve long-term retention and can also help with things like application of concepts (not just memory)
And Anki provides such spaced, interleaved retrieval practice
Iām being lazy in not explaining the jargon or citing my sources, but you can find some explanation and sources here: Augmenting Long-term Memory
If one person makes an Anki deck based on the EA Wiki entries, it can then be used and/āor built on by other people, can be shared with participants in EA Fellowships, etc.
Possible reasons not to do this:
āThereās a lot of stuff itād be useful for people to know that isnāt on EA Wiki entries. Why not make Anki cards on those things instead? Isnāt this a bit insular?ā
I think we can and should do both, rather than one or the other
Same goes for having Anki cards based on EA sources vs Anki cards based on non-EA sources
Personally, Iād guess ~25% of my Anki cards are based on EA sources, ~70% are based on non-EA sources but are about topics I see as important for EA reasons, and 5% are random personal life stuff
See also Suggestion: Make Anki cards, share them as posts, and share key updates
āThis seems pretty time-consumingā
I think there are a lot of people in the EA community for whom engaging with the EA Wiki entries to the extent required to make this deck would be worthwhile just for themselves
I also think there are even more people in the EA community for whom using all or a subset of these cards will be worthwhile
(Though there are also of course people for whom these things arenāt true)
āMany of the entries probably wonāt actually be that well-suited to Anki cards, or arenāt on very important thingsā
Agreed
But many will be
The card-maker(s) can skip entries, and the card-users can delete some cards from their own copy of the deck
āThis seems like rote learning /ā indoctrination /ā stifling creativity /ā rah rahā
I quite strongly feel that these sorts of concerns about these like Anki cards are often misguided, including this case
I can expand on that if anyone actually does feel worried about this idea for this reason