In the table with post-discussion distributions, how is the lower bound of the aggregate distribution for the Open Phil AI Fellowship −73, when the lowest lower bound for an individual researcher is −2.4? Also in that row, Researcher 3′s distribution is given as “250 to 320”, which doesn’t include their median (35) and is too large for a scale that’s normalized to 100.
Also in that row, Researcher 3′s distribution is given as “250 to 320”, which doesn’t include their median (35) and is too large for a scale that’s normalized to 100.
In the table with post-discussion distributions, how is the lower bound of the aggregate distribution for the Open Phil AI Fellowship −73, when the lowest lower bound for an individual researcher is −2.4? Also in that row, Researcher 3′s distribution is given as “250 to 320”, which doesn’t include their median (35) and is too large for a scale that’s normalized to 100.
Hey, thanks
Should have been −250, updated.
This also explains the −73.