I looked at OpenPhil grants tagged as “Longtermism” in 2021 or 2022 (from here or the downloadable spreadsheet). Though I note that you mentioned “we also included a number of grants now-defunct FTX-associated funders had made.”
I think this is screened off by Holden’s explanation:
About 40% of our longtermist grantmaking over the last 18 months (by dollars) would have qualified for tier 4 or better (which, under the new guidance, means it would be funded). Note that this figure refers only to our longtermist grantmaking, and does not include grants by other funders (we included some of the latter in our exercise, but I’m reporting a figure based on Open Philanthropy alone because I think it will be easier to interpret). [emphasis mine, included surrounding text in quote so easier to interpret]
I think this is screened off by Holden’s explanation: