Ian David Moss mentioned some overlap between IIDM and “improving science”, which is something I’ve been thinking about a bit lately. From this survey, I think that overlap exists in at least
Funding mechanisms.
Designing mechanisms to align incentives more with social merit or scientific merit.
Maybe any other thing that causes the academic institution to be more efficient.
Thanks EdoAarad! Yes, I think there are definitely parallels. I was a bit personally disappointed not to see meta-science considered more within the scope of IIDM as it’s something I’m very interested in too. And glad you like the name! :)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Ian David Moss mentioned some overlap between IIDM and “improving science”, which is something I’ve been thinking about a bit lately. From this survey, I think that overlap exists in at least
Funding mechanisms.
Designing mechanisms to align incentives more with social merit or scientific merit.
Maybe any other thing that causes the academic institution to be more efficient.
Thanks EdoAarad! Yes, I think there are definitely parallels. I was a bit personally disappointed not to see meta-science considered more within the scope of IIDM as it’s something I’m very interested in too. And glad you like the name! :)