Ian David Moss mentioned some overlap between IIDM and “improving science”, which is something I’ve been thinking about a bit lately. From this survey, I think that overlap exists in at least
Funding mechanisms.
Designing mechanisms to align incentives more with social merit or scientific merit.
Maybe any other thing that causes the academic institution to be more efficient.
Thanks EdoAarad! Yes, I think there are definitely parallels. I was a bit personally disappointed not to see meta-science considered more within the scope of IIDM as it’s something I’m very interested in too. And glad you like the name! :)
Ian David Moss mentioned some overlap between IIDM and “improving science”, which is something I’ve been thinking about a bit lately. From this survey, I think that overlap exists in at least
Funding mechanisms.
Designing mechanisms to align incentives more with social merit or scientific merit.
Maybe any other thing that causes the academic institution to be more efficient.
Thanks EdoAarad! Yes, I think there are definitely parallels. I was a bit personally disappointed not to see meta-science considered more within the scope of IIDM as it’s something I’m very interested in too. And glad you like the name! :)