Hi! I noticed that many footnote links don’t work my laptop’s Chrome—e.g. both of the following links in the semi-informative priors report link to the same thing
https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/semi-informative-priors-over-ai-timelines/
https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/semi-informative-priors-over-ai-timelines/#footnote1_mph26jj
Also:
The footnotes don’t seem to work until footnote number ~140 of the report, but later numbers do
The footnotes seem to work on an older version of the website, so I’m guessing something happened during the website update https://web.archive.org/web/20220302181733/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/semi-informative-priors
Not sure if this is just a problem on my end though, anyone else encountering the same issue?
A couple of reports had their footnotes get jumbled — a fix is in progress. Thanks for the note!
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Hi! I noticed that many footnote links don’t work my laptop’s Chrome—e.g. both of the following links in the semi-informative priors report link to the same thing
https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/semi-informative-priors-over-ai-timelines/
https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/semi-informative-priors-over-ai-timelines/#footnote1_mph26jj
Also:
The footnotes don’t seem to work until footnote number ~140 of the report, but later numbers do
The footnotes seem to work on an older version of the website, so I’m guessing something happened during the website update https://web.archive.org/web/20220302181733/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/semi-informative-priors
Not sure if this is just a problem on my end though, anyone else encountering the same issue?
A couple of reports had their footnotes get jumbled — a fix is in progress. Thanks for the note!