Thank you! I will get back to you. My honest reaction to this comment: “AAAAAHHHH damn, this should be so incredibly obvious!! where to even start?” But I recognize I’m deep into the inside view of log scales, phenomenology visualization, valence quantification, etc. What seems mind-numbingly foot-stompingly obvious to me might not be to others. Do I say: “PLEASE BE CREATIVE” or should I write a treaties expanding on every point? I’ll do the latter. And I apologize for my candid reaction comment XD Seriously, I appreciarte the comment. It’s just… ahhhhhh!
[to be clear you raise very good points—I’m just trying to do the prosocial thing and communicate the large “inference gap” on this topic that currently exists—I’ll do better! Will respond object level. Cheers!]
Thank you! I will get back to you. My honest reaction to this comment: “AAAAAHHHH damn, this should be so incredibly obvious!! where to even start?” But I recognize I’m deep into the inside view of log scales, phenomenology visualization, valence quantification, etc. What seems mind-numbingly foot-stompingly obvious to me might not be to others. Do I say: “PLEASE BE CREATIVE” or should I write a treaties expanding on every point? I’ll do the latter. And I apologize for my candid reaction comment XD Seriously, I appreciarte the comment. It’s just… ahhhhhh!
[to be clear you raise very good points—I’m just trying to do the prosocial thing and communicate the large “inference gap” on this topic that currently exists—I’ll do better! Will respond object level. Cheers!]