I was coming from âfake newsâ background where click-bait titles and controversy gets you clicks and comments, but here only downvotes...
My style is often controversial and Iâm definitely not sorry.
Just like environmentalist are talking about Polar Bear đ» losing natural habitat⊠For someone living on $1 per day, who donât have passport, donât have bank account, donât have electricityâdoes it matter? Iâm worried about catastrophic climate change.Animal industrial agricultureâwaste of land, waste of water, CO2, agricultural subsidiesâitâs TERRIBLE DISASTER. Iâd love the market to decide:
market price for water
market price for CO2
no subsidies
There is market for premium meat! My personal viewâIâm OK to have chickens and eat eggs in my own homestead. Iâll treat them well.
You still seem confused. You say your views are controversial, as if this community doesnât allow for and value controversial opinions, and think that itâs the claims you made. That is not the case. Hopefully this comment is clear enough to explain.
1. This was a low-effort post. It was full of half-formed ideas, contained neither a title or a introduction that related to the remainder of the post, nor a clear conclusion. The sentences were not complete, and there was clearly no grammar check.
2. Look at successful posts on the forum. They contain full sentences, have a clear topic and thoughts about a topic that are explained clearly, and engage with past discussion. Itâs important to notice the standards in a given forum before participating. In this case, you didnât bother looking at other posts or understanding the community norms.
3. You have not engaged with other posts, and may not have even read them. Your first attempt to post or comment reflects that lack of broader engagement. You have no post history to make people think you have given this any thought whatsoever.
4. Your unrelated comments link to your other irrelevant work, which seems crass.
Thank you for the generous comment.
I was coming from âfake newsâ background where click-bait titles and controversy gets you clicks and comments, but here only downvotes...
My style is often controversial and Iâm definitely not sorry.
Just like environmentalist are talking about Polar Bear đ» losing natural habitat⊠For someone living on $1 per day, who donât have passport, donât have bank account, donât have electricityâdoes it matter? Iâm worried about catastrophic climate change.Animal industrial agricultureâwaste of land, waste of water, CO2, agricultural subsidiesâitâs TERRIBLE DISASTER. Iâd love the market to decide:
market price for water
market price for CO2
no subsidies
There is market for premium meat! My personal viewâIâm OK to have chickens and eat eggs in my own homestead. Iâll treat them well.
You still seem confused. You say your views are controversial, as if this community doesnât allow for and value controversial opinions, and think that itâs the claims you made. That is not the case. Hopefully this comment is clear enough to explain.
1. This was a low-effort post. It was full of half-formed ideas, contained neither a title or a introduction that related to the remainder of the post, nor a clear conclusion. The sentences were not complete, and there was clearly no grammar check.
2. Look at successful posts on the forum. They contain full sentences, have a clear topic and thoughts about a topic that are explained clearly, and engage with past discussion. Itâs important to notice the standards in a given forum before participating. In this case, you didnât bother looking at other posts or understanding the community norms.
3. You have not engaged with other posts, and may not have even read them. Your first attempt to post or comment reflects that lack of broader engagement. You have no post history to make people think you have given this any thought whatsoever.
4. Your unrelated comments link to your other irrelevant work, which seems crass.