I was coming from āfake newsā background where click-bait titles and controversy gets you clicks and comments, but here only downvotes...
My style is often controversial and Iām definitely not sorry.
Just like environmentalist are talking about Polar Bear š» losing natural habitatā¦ For someone living on $1 per day, who donāt have passport, donāt have bank account, donāt have electricityādoes it matter? Iām worried about catastrophic climate change.Animal industrial agricultureāwaste of land, waste of water, CO2, agricultural subsidiesāitās TERRIBLE DISASTER. Iād love the market to decide:
market price for water
market price for CO2
no subsidies
There is market for premium meat! My personal viewāIām OK to have chickens and eat eggs in my own homestead. Iāll treat them well.
You still seem confused. You say your views are controversial, as if this community doesnāt allow for and value controversial opinions, and think that itās the claims you made. That is not the case. Hopefully this comment is clear enough to explain.
1. This was a low-effort post. It was full of half-formed ideas, contained neither a title or a introduction that related to the remainder of the post, nor a clear conclusion. The sentences were not complete, and there was clearly no grammar check.
2. Look at successful posts on the forum. They contain full sentences, have a clear topic and thoughts about a topic that are explained clearly, and engage with past discussion. Itās important to notice the standards in a given forum before participating. In this case, you didnāt bother looking at other posts or understanding the community norms.
3. You have not engaged with other posts, and may not have even read them. Your first attempt to post or comment reflects that lack of broader engagement. You have no post history to make people think you have given this any thought whatsoever.
4. Your unrelated comments link to your other irrelevant work, which seems crass.
Thank you for the generous comment.
I was coming from āfake newsā background where click-bait titles and controversy gets you clicks and comments, but here only downvotes...
My style is often controversial and Iām definitely not sorry.
Just like environmentalist are talking about Polar Bear š» losing natural habitatā¦ For someone living on $1 per day, who donāt have passport, donāt have bank account, donāt have electricityādoes it matter? Iām worried about catastrophic climate change.Animal industrial agricultureāwaste of land, waste of water, CO2, agricultural subsidiesāitās TERRIBLE DISASTER. Iād love the market to decide:
market price for water
market price for CO2
no subsidies
There is market for premium meat! My personal viewāIām OK to have chickens and eat eggs in my own homestead. Iāll treat them well.
You still seem confused. You say your views are controversial, as if this community doesnāt allow for and value controversial opinions, and think that itās the claims you made. That is not the case. Hopefully this comment is clear enough to explain.
1. This was a low-effort post. It was full of half-formed ideas, contained neither a title or a introduction that related to the remainder of the post, nor a clear conclusion. The sentences were not complete, and there was clearly no grammar check.
2. Look at successful posts on the forum. They contain full sentences, have a clear topic and thoughts about a topic that are explained clearly, and engage with past discussion. Itās important to notice the standards in a given forum before participating. In this case, you didnāt bother looking at other posts or understanding the community norms.
3. You have not engaged with other posts, and may not have even read them. Your first attempt to post or comment reflects that lack of broader engagement. You have no post history to make people think you have given this any thought whatsoever.
4. Your unrelated comments link to your other irrelevant work, which seems crass.