This isnāt true if Greg values animal welfare donations above most non-AI things by a sufficient amount.
I think Greg would have been happy to go ahead with this bet regardless of my donation plans.
He could have tried to shop around for more favorable conditions with someone else in EA circles but it seems pretty likely that heād end up going with this one.
For reference, Greg has had a similar offer to this bet for around a year on X, although I guess many do not know about it (I did not until 2 months ago).
Yes, I would go ahead regardless of the other partyās plans for their winnings (but for the record I very much approve of Vascoās valuing of animal welfare).
Thanks for the comment, mlsbt!
I think Greg would have been happy to go ahead with this bet regardless of my donation plans.
For reference, Greg has had a similar offer to this bet for around a year on X, although I guess many do not know about it (I did not until 2 months ago).
Yes, I would go ahead regardless of the other partyās plans for their winnings (but for the record I very much approve of Vascoās valuing of animal welfare).
I originally intended this bet to be made with enemies, not friends[1]. i.e. I was hoping an e/āacc would take it, rather than an EA!
Iām using āfriendā in a general sense here, as in someone broadly value aligned. I donāt actually know Vasco.