I downvoted it because it is AI generated, and reads (to me) like someone has prompted an AI to ‘respond to this post’, i.e. it doesn’t really make any specific points. I could be wrong though, and clearly others have found value in it.
Hi Toby, that’s a fair comment. I dictated a reply to the post to my LLM and then it put together into something less rambley and slightly more cohesive. I then edited it manually, but I guess some of the AI-stink remained! I do think I added something new to it, as my professional experience as an animal rights activist is that the animal space is quite under developed. So content was all mine (a human with experience in the field, albeit mostly agreeing with both pieces!), but the formatting and copywriting was handled by AI.
Makes sense Carlos! It might be a personal thing but when I see AI writing I often struggle to read it/​ understand what is the idea of the author and what is the AI-fluff.
I downvoted it because it is AI generated, and reads (to me) like someone has prompted an AI to ‘respond to this post’, i.e. it doesn’t really make any specific points. I could be wrong though, and clearly others have found value in it.
Hi Toby, that’s a fair comment. I dictated a reply to the post to my LLM and then it put together into something less rambley and slightly more cohesive. I then edited it manually, but I guess some of the AI-stink remained! I do think I added something new to it, as my professional experience as an animal rights activist is that the animal space is quite under developed. So content was all mine (a human with experience in the field, albeit mostly agreeing with both pieces!), but the formatting and copywriting was handled by AI.
Makes sense Carlos! It might be a personal thing but when I see AI writing I often struggle to read it/​ understand what is the idea of the author and what is the AI-fluff.