This sort of falls under the second category, âGrantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to return to creditors or depositors.â At least thatâs how I read it, though the more I think about it the more this category is kind of confusing and your wording seems more direct.
I think itâd be preferable to explicitly list as a reason for applying something along the lines of âGrantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to protect themselves from potential clawbacksâ.
Less importantly, itâd possibly be better to make it separate from âto return to creditors or depositorsâ.
This sort of falls under the second category, âGrantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to return to creditors or depositors.â At least thatâs how I read it, though the more I think about it the more this category is kind of confusing and your wording seems more direct.
I think itâd be preferable to explicitly list as a reason for applying something along the lines of âGrantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to protect themselves from potential clawbacksâ.
Less importantly, itâd possibly be better to make it separate from âto return to creditors or depositorsâ.