You may want to also consider the situation where an organisation doesn’t want to pay employees with funds that could potentially be clawed back or which could be seen to be morally-tainted (depending on what information we find out).
I strongly suspect there are legal reasons that covering future clawbacks, especially if they say so explicitly, is not going to be workable, or at least is significantly more complex / dangerous legally.
This sort of falls under the second category, “Grantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to return to creditors or depositors.” At least that’s how I read it, though the more I think about it the more this category is kind of confusing and your wording seems more direct.
I think it’d be preferable to explicitly list as a reason for applying something along the lines of “Grantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to protect themselves from potential clawbacks”.
Less importantly, it’d possibly be better to make it separate from “to return to creditors or depositors”.
You may want to also consider the situation where an organisation doesn’t want to pay employees with funds that could potentially be clawed back or which could be seen to be morally-tainted (depending on what information we find out).
(I work at Open Phil assisting with this effort.)
We think that people in this situation should apply. The language was intended to include this case, but it may not have been clear.
I strongly suspect there are legal reasons that covering future clawbacks, especially if they say so explicitly, is not going to be workable, or at least is significantly more complex / dangerous legally.
This sort of falls under the second category, “Grantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to return to creditors or depositors.” At least that’s how I read it, though the more I think about it the more this category is kind of confusing and your wording seems more direct.
I think it’d be preferable to explicitly list as a reason for applying something along the lines of “Grantees who received funds, but want to set them aside to protect themselves from potential clawbacks”.
Less importantly, it’d possibly be better to make it separate from “to return to creditors or depositors”.