I think thereâs definitely a clear two-level distinction going on here, where EAGx is for people early on in the EA-conveyor-belt, and once theyâve fully internalised and working on impact that they can move onto EAG. Furthermore, I donât think this distinction is properly internalised by the community, partly because it doesnât actually line up with all the facts. Many people rejected from EA Global âhave a solid understanding of the core ideas of EA and who are taking significant actions based on those ideasâ, and are thus understandably upset when their application is rejected.
Making the distinction between the two much more clear in branding would make the distinction and the stakes more clear. I also think that having the big event for all EAs should be the biggest ones from a community building perspective! While the more regional, local ones might make more sense for network events for people working in the same field in similar geographical areas. But thatâs currently the other way around.
Tl;dr: I still donât think the EA Global/âEAGx distinction is getting at what Scottâs pointing out in the quote
But the proposed access free EAG would result in something with the vibe of an EAGx.
EAG career conference for folks already working in high impact areas. EAGx community conference for everyone.
Is an EAG so different from an EAGx that we need a single huge EAG somewhere, where everyone can attend? And wouldnât this undermine the distinction?
Well yes, but actually no...
I think thereâs definitely a clear two-level distinction going on here, where EAGx is for people early on in the EA-conveyor-belt, and once theyâve fully internalised and working on impact that they can move onto EAG. Furthermore, I donât think this distinction is properly internalised by the community, partly because it doesnât actually line up with all the facts. Many people rejected from EA Global âhave a solid understanding of the core ideas of EA and who are taking significant actions based on those ideasâ, and are thus understandably upset when their application is rejected.
Making the distinction between the two much more clear in branding would make the distinction and the stakes more clear. I also think that having the big event for all EAs should be the biggest ones from a community building perspective! While the more regional, local ones might make more sense for network events for people working in the same field in similar geographical areas. But thatâs currently the other way around.
Tl;dr: I still donât think the EA Global/âEAGx distinction is getting at what Scottâs pointing out in the quote
But the proposed access free EAG would result in something with the vibe of an EAGx.
EAG career conference for folks already working in high impact areas.
EAGx community conference for everyone.
Is an EAG so different from an EAGx that we need a single huge EAG somewhere, where everyone can attend? And wouldnât this undermine the distinction?
Which need is not addressed in an EAGx?