To the extent that a short-termist framing views going from 80% to 81% population loss as equally as bad as 99% to 100%, it seems plausible to care less about e.g. refuges to evade pandemics. Other approaches like ALLFED and civilisational resilience work might look less effective on the short-termist framing also. Even if you also place some intrinsic weight on preventing extinction, this might not be enough to make these approaches look cost-effective.
ALLFED-type work is likely highly cost effective from the short-term perspective; see global and country (US) specific analyses.
ALLFED-type work is likely highly cost effective from the short-term perspective; see global and country (US) specific analyses.