(Ironically, I suppose the title—“We don’t have evidence that the best charities are over 1000x more cost effective than the average”—is also an overly confident claim, where a question might have been better, unless the original poster had carried out an exhaustive search for relevant evidence)
Thanks for the first comment and for this note! I hadn’t seen the 80k article, which would have been a useful document to feed in. But regardless I think the strength of the title matched the confidence of my belief (perhaps 98%)
(Ironically, I suppose the title—“We don’t have evidence that the best charities are over 1000x more cost effective than the average”—is also an overly confident claim, where a question might have been better, unless the original poster had carried out an exhaustive search for relevant evidence)
Thanks for the first comment and for this note! I hadn’t seen the 80k article, which would have been a useful document to feed in. But regardless I think the strength of the title matched the confidence of my belief (perhaps 98%)