My model is that most of the people applying for those jobs are not interested in x risk reduction. So if I land one of those jobs, Iâm one of a very few people in the world doing government ai policy with an eye towards x risk reduction. So you could say âAI policy with an eye towards x risk reductionâ is neglected, but if I were to say âAI policyâ is neglected thatâs what Iâd mean. And then, something something pr something something and I think you have why itâs not more clear.
Itâs true that few civil servants are currently thinking about x-risks from AI.
If you believe artificial general intelligence wonât emerge for several decades, you might be happy that there will be hundreds of experts with decades worth of experience at that point, and not worry about doing it yourself.
My model is that most of the people applying for those jobs are not interested in x risk reduction. So if I land one of those jobs, Iâm one of a very few people in the world doing government ai policy with an eye towards x risk reduction. So you could say âAI policy with an eye towards x risk reductionâ is neglected, but if I were to say âAI policyâ is neglected thatâs what Iâd mean. And then, something something pr something something and I think you have why itâs not more clear.
Itâs true that few civil servants are currently thinking about x-risks from AI.
If you believe artificial general intelligence wonât emerge for several decades, you might be happy that there will be hundreds of experts with decades worth of experience at that point, and not worry about doing it yourself.