Linch, that sounds like a reasonable approach. I think something like that could work.
Ultimately, I guess a high value per dollarwould then be assigned to anyone who donated ~‘maximally our best guess impactfully’ in either of the three categories,
… and then the value would scale ~linearly with the amount donated ‘max-impactfully’ to either of the three categories.
Might be somewhat difficult to explain this to a smart popular audience, but I suspect it might be doable.
Do you mean all three separately (humans, animals, potential people) or trying to combine them in the same rating?
My impression was that separate could work but combining them ‘one of the three will overwhelm the others’.
If you do a linear weighting, this is expected. But one approach to worldview diversification is that you can normalize.
Linch, that sounds like a reasonable approach. I think something like that could work.
Ultimately, I guess a high value per dollarwould then be assigned to anyone who donated ~‘maximally our best guess impactfully’ in either of the three categories,
… and then the value would scale ~linearly with the amount donated ‘max-impactfully’ to either of the three categories.
Might be somewhat difficult to explain this to a smart popular audience, but I suspect it might be doable.