But to compromise with near future focused value systems, maybe we should still be focused on near-term effects of interventions which seem relatively unimpactful in the long run.
I’m not sure what meta-ethical framework we would use to broker such a compromise. Perhaps some kind of moral congress (a)?
I haven’t yet figured out how to allot the proportions of such a congress in a way that feels principled. Do you know of any work on this?
I’m not sure what meta-ethical framework we would use to broker such a compromise. Perhaps some kind of moral congress (a)?
I haven’t yet figured out how to allot the proportions of such a congress in a way that feels principled. Do you know of any work on this?
Not offhand, but I would probably use some kind of Bayesian approach.
See toy dialogue.